U S S Constitution Knowledge Base
How can Proposition 8 in California be found unconstitutional if it is part of California's constitution? Isn't this is state's rights thing? What part of the U.S. Constitution gives this federal jurisdiction? Also, am I right to assume that civil unions were not allowed in California prior to the passing of the Prop. 8? If we can redfine the word marriage as between two women or two men, then, why can't it be defined as between as person and a non-human mammal? Isn't it because even the courts follow a basic natural law? Also, do the courts we really have the right to define words? Thought many dictionaries have as their 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc. definitions to include "two people" and not just a man and a woman, it used to be just that. What's wrong with marriage being for heterosexuals and civil unions for homosexuals, as long as they have the same rights? And no, this is not a separate but equal thing...no one is being separated...just the opposite actually Joe Finkle: Thank you for your answer. But, how is this a 14th Amendment issue? The California voters declared that gay marriage isn't a right, and because it was put up for a vote, due process was given. Also, regarding the "stigma" of civil unions. Who generates the stigma, and how can it BE a stigma if a civil union grants and affords the same rights and protections as a marriage does?
How Do We begin the process of Changing the U.S. Constitution to allow a California style recall election? According to an answer to my last question, the U.S. federal Constitution has no provision to begin a recall election such as what happened in California. What's the basic steps? Do we circulate petitions? Do we call our representatives to introduce such a bill? This poster said it could take over ten years, but if Congress can give away almost a trillion dollars in legislation passed in around a week's time, I don't buy that.
How is OBAMA allowed to ignore the 10th Ammendment of the U.S. Constitution? "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Consequently Obama, mandating Federal health care is illegal according to the U.S. Constitution. The people of the respective states did not allow it, nor did the individual states. The states didn't bring it to the citizens to vote on in order for the representatives to take it to congress in representation of the respective states citizens. So how is Obama able to get away with obfuscating the U.S. Constitution? Verdeflav: Yes, Obama Introduced it, his legal advisors did nothing to point out his error, congress was flat out coerced and bullied into taking his pet project and honing it into something politician (not the people), could accept and then he signed off on it...again knowing it's against the 10th Ammendment. So you tell us, how is Obama not to be held responsible? Terrance, When the federal government asserts itself upon the state, arbitrary to the people the right of the state has been upsurped in contrast to the Constitution. The executive branch is obligated to uphold the states reserved rights. What OBAMA is doing is an end run around the establishment of the republic comprised of individual states. By his declaration of taxing the individual in lieu of mandate, federally, is in violation. It is the individual states responsibility to decide if it wants to impose a measure (mandatory health care), upon the people. Not the federal government collectively. Remember, rights aren't purchased, but inherently given. The United states is just that. Comprised of the many. it's not one big "collective" state, as Obama would prefer it be.
Is U S Aid to Israel a violation of the U S Constitution's separation of church and state? Israel is a self described Jewish state, Jew is a religion, therefore if the government gives Israel 3-6 billion a year it must also give every other religion in the US 3-6 billion dollars or it is favoring one religion over another which violates the constitution. Can I sue the US government to make them stop violating my constitutional rights? 1. When an israeli Arab is allowed to run for prime minister of Israel i will believe it is a secular state. 2. Using my tax dollars to aid a religion is government imposition of religious beliefs on individuals, which is Illegal under the constitution.
How do I cite the U. S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, etc. in a paper? I am writing a History paper, and I am required to make references in the text to the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and possibly the Federalist Papers #10 and #51. My question is, I do not know how to cite these documents, either in the text (with parentetical citations) and on my "works cited" page. This is an MLA-style paper, and I've checked a lot of MLA writing style guides and websites, but they do not specify. Could anyone help me with this?
Tell of the Supreme Court responsibility in interpreting the Constitution, in other words, why does the U.S.? * Who are the current justices and how long have they been serving on the Supreme Court? * Tell of the Supreme Court responsibility in interpreting the Constitution -- in other words, why does the U.S. Constitution play an important part in the work of the United States Supreme Court? * Give an example of one or two Supreme Court cases (including dates and title of the court cases) and whether you believe the decisions handed down were in agreement with the truths of the Bible.
What other parts of the U.S. Constitution does the Right want to scrap? Cons have been rallying for a while to get rid of the 14th Amendment, which has been in effect since 1868 and gives citizenship to all persons born in the U.S. Now they want to get rid of the 1st Amendment, which guarantees us freedom of religion. What part of the Constitution is next for the right?
What is the purpose of the preamble of the U.S. constitution? I have a small homework assignment that I really do not understand. It says, Find the preamble fromt the constitution of the U.S. And breifly write what the purpose of the preamble is. I NEED THIS ASSP. It is due today and I have to email my teacher the Homework. Thanks a lot :D Thanks a lot,
How do we make amend the U.S. constitution to ban gay marraige? Does the 30 states that have bans on gay marriage in thier constitution count toward the 38 states needed to amend the Constitution? Say it passed the house and the senate..What exactly happens after that to amend the U.S. Constitution? If its enshrined in the Constitution its impossible to be unconsitutional..I talking about changing the constitution
Should Christian beliefs be put above the U.S. Constitution? For those of you that said yes should be put to death for treason. To those that believe this country was founded on Christian beliefs, whoever told you that should also be punched in the nose for telling lies? The constitution could guarantee freedom for all men and women but religion cannot. The constitution acknowledges man’s inalienable rights to choose for him self but religion put Gods rights above all men. Since God is a silent force that cannot defend his own words by default his words become null and void over the Constitution or in life itself.
What's the difference between the Constitution Party and the Republican party? I'm having trouble identifying myself as a mainstream Republican, both because of how liberal the party has become and how professional the entire political scene has become; it was never the Founding Fathers' vision to have senators in place for 30 years. In the US, politics was never intended to be a profession... it was a temporary sacrifice of personal life to help govern the nation with your experience and education. But I digress. I've been reading up on the Constitution Party and it seems quite appealing to me. However, what I gather is that it's rather isolationist, such as no UN or other significant global presence, and against the wars in the Middle East. I think a global view is very important for the US as we move farther into the 3rd millennium, and although it may have been a mistake to go into Iraq and Afghanistan, since we're there we need to accomplish what we set out for. What are the real differences between the Constitution Party and the Republican party? I've heard the word Libertarian thrown around as well. What, besides Wikipedia (already bookmarked these entries, lol), should I be reading to understand the basis of these political parties? I guess I could call myself Anti-isolationist Constitutional, haha.
U.S. HISTORY HELP! PLEASE ):? Unit 3: Unit 3 - 3.14 Unit 3 Test: Part 1 Help icon Help Time Remaining: 1. What expedition did Thomas Jefferson establish to explore the West under the leadership of Lewis and Clark? (Points: 3) The Corps of Discovery The Northwest Passagers The Mountain Rangers The Western Explorers 2. Whose presidency was responsible for the creation of the judiciary system? (Points: 3) George Washington James Madison John Adams Thomas Jefferson 3. What was the effect of the Louisiana Purchase? (Points: 3) It improved relations with England and Canada and prevented Indian invasions. It prevented a western attack on the United States by Spain. It stimulated the economy and strengthened the alliance with France. It doubled the size of the country and provided control of the Mississippi River. 4. Which of the following events did not occur during the John Adams administration? (Points: 3) buildup of the U.S. Navy XYZ Affair the Alien and Sedition Crisis the Whiskey Rebellion 5. What laws allowed the president to hold or deport immigrants and impose penalties for defaming the government? (Points: 3) the Judiciary Acts of 1789 and 1792 the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions the 12th and 13th Amendments to the Constitution the Alien and Sedition Acts 6. Which were elements of Alexander Hamilton's financial plan for the United States? (Points: 3) creating a national bank, reducing the national debt, and promoting loyalty to the federal government collecting taxes from the states, trading with England, and increasing cotton production promoting loyalty to the states, reducing the deficit, and building the military creating state banks, minting new money, and establishing tariffs 7. Hamilton's financial plan called for which of the following? (Points: 3) refusing to pay the debt to France raising money by asking for foreign aid having the states assume the national debt paying off the national debt gradually 8. How did Washington's Farewell Address affect the actions of the United States during the nineteenth century? (Points: 3) It led to a buildup of military force and the establishment of the navy. It laid the groundwork for a war between the states. It caused both Spain and France to build alliances with the United States. It set the stage for a government policy rejecting foreign involvement. 9. When the first two political parties developed, what issue divided them most clearly? (Points: 3) alliance with Britain versus alliance with France federal power versus states' rights taxation versus donation slavery versus abolition 10. What is another name for the first 10 amendments to the Constitution guaranteeing individual freedoms? (Points: 3) Declaration of Individual Rights Citizen Responsibilities and Privileges American Rights and Duties Bill of Rights 11. What was the significance of the election of 1800? (Points: 3) It was decided in the House of Representatives and led to a constitutional amendment. George Washington handed over the reins of power to John Adams. It allowed two of the founding fathers, Adams and Jefferson, to serve at the same time. The British agreed strongly with the results, which strengthened the alliance with England. 12. Which statement best describes the territory shown on the map? > (Points: 3) It established control of the Mississippi River and doubled the size of the United States. It contained the rivers needed to navigate the Northwest Passage to the Pacific Ocean. It was a territory that allowed seven more slave states and eight more free states. It contained rich farmlands that the French fought to control after the War of 1812. 13. Which of the following became states out of land acquired by the Louisiana Purchase? (Points: 3) Mississippi, Illinois, Alabama, Missouri Texas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Kentucky Minnesota, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas Wisconsin, Indiana, West Virginia, Iowa 14. What treaty ended the War of 1812 and set up a peaceful process for resolving future disputes? (Points: 3) Treaty of Ghent Peace of 1815 Treaty of Paris of 1814 Washington and London Agreement 15. When the War of 1812 ended, what was the outcome? (Points: 3) The British got a large part of the Louisiana Purchase despite losing New Orleans. The war was actually a draw, and both sides reverted to their positions before the war.
U.S.History help? anyone better at history than me? because I don't get this.? 1. What rights were not guaranteed to all African Americans by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? A. full citizenship B. equal protection under the law C. voting D. due process 2. What development caused additional problems for blacks during Reconstruction? A. the Ku Klux Klan and the cost of public schools B. voting requirements and a military draft C. Black Codes and the Ku Klux Klan D. federal income taxes and Black Codes 3. Which statement most accurately characterizes President Andrew Johnson's stance on Reconstruction? A. He supported Reconstruction by signing the Civil Rights Bill and the Reconstruction Act. B. He met with congressional leaders to determine the best form of assistance to freed slaves. C. He opposed congressional reconstruction efforts through vetoes, removals from office, and anger. D. He brought former Confederate and Union leaders together to determine the best path for the nation. 4. What were the main elements of the Compromise of 1877? A. approval of Rutherford Hayes's election to the presidency and return to home rule for the South B. recount of the 1876 election returns and a planned withdrawal of federal troops from the South C. appointments of Samuel Tilden as vice president and Ulysses Grant as secretary of war D. a second term as president for Ulysses Grant and reinstatement of Edward Stanton as secretary of war. 5. What was one of the successes of the Reconstruction era? A. The southern economy was quickly restored to pre-Civil War levels. B. Freed slaves were able to achieve economic stability equal to their white counterparts. C. Blacks achieved and maintained equal levels of political participation. D. Southern states were reincorporated into the Union. 6. What was one of the failures of the Reconstruction era? A. African Americans had no due process protections. B. African Americans in the South were barred from owning property. C. Political opportunities for African Americans disappeared after a short time. D. African Americans in the South resisted public education for their children.
It is legal to give a cop the finger in the U.S. and is protected by Free Speech....? Giving a cop the middle finger is protected under the constitution by the freedom of speech and has been up held countless times. Considering it is completely legal... Would you still arrest someone for flipping you off? I guess the below answers prove why cops EARN the lack of respect and negative opinon from citizens. To find an excuse to arrest of detain someone for exercising their FREEDOM is an ABUSE of power. You all deserve the disrespect and lack of appreciation you recieve. Where have I stated >>>I<<<< was planning on flipping of an officer? Idiots, reading comprehension is necessary for answering questions.
What's so hard about just reading the Constitution? It's only a few dozen pages and written at a 5th grade reading level. So why are so many adults so ignorant of it? and if you don't believe in some of it, why don't you just admit it? It will never be changed if people just go on saying they believe in part of it but then support legislation that goes against it. vollybab... maybe you should take the 2nd amendment in context like the others. There wouldnt have been a military if individuals didnt have guns, the same is still true. I served in the army and most guys who werent raised with guns cant shoot. Your husband is an example of why we have a supreme court instead of leaving interpreting the constitution upto average people but the problem is they're just as bad when then they should know better.
How can a State's National Guard be deployed to foreign soil? Isn't the National Guard a State's exclusive militia under the authority of the State Constitution and Govenor? Would the State have to declare "war" for foreign deployment? and does the State have the power to delegate authority and control of it's own militia to the Federal Government? My sister-in-law is in a State's National Guard, she is NOT in the Reserves, and she is to be deployed to Afghanistan next month.
Regarding liberals, do you agree that it's not that the Constitution is "outdated", but rather...? I was just thinking about how liberals can never cite anything written in the Constitution and articulate exactly how it is no longer relevant. Their notion that it is "outdated" is never explained any further than those words. Could this be because they want to suck off of government teet? That the Constitution doesn't allow for "free stuff"? Chuck N, which issue do you want to have a rational debate about? I'm game. The Zeitgeist, the 13th and 14th amendments kind of nullify that clause
Is secession becoming a real issue in U.S. Politics? Over the past week, I attempted to answer 6 questions regarding secession. All 6 had been deleted. I asked if it was being censored from yahoo, and my question was deleted (Reinstated on Appeal). In the course of my experience with human events, monitoring, even the internet, for keywords and censorship usually is an indication that an issue is becoming a major concern to Government (Acorn monitoring?) I have read that 6 States had raised the issue. In addition, I have heard from people in Texas that it was a hot issue, as Texas expressly put in their treaty joining the U.S. a right to secede. Is it becoming a real issue? Who would it serve more, the preservation of the United States, it's Constitution, and it's freedoms, or those who wish to dissolve the U.S. to usher in a global government? To Obama . . . It is not the privately owned cite censoring, it is members, probably joining after a hit on key word searches.
Do you believe the right to privacy is implied in the Constitution of the U.S? I expect a wide array of diverse answers on this one. I intentionally kept the question vague because I'm interested in the quality of an answer, not necessarily what I personally believe it to be. I would simply ask that we keep our answers civil, whether you're liberal or conservative. And if you would, please give an explanation as to why you believe the right to privacy is implied or not. And if you believe it's not implied but is literally stated within the Consitution, please give your reason/s for believing thus. Thank you.
Should we have a legally enforceable claim against other people's resources? If you say "no", then why should there be entitlement programs for welfare, health care or any other thing that allows some Americans to take money from other Americans in the form of tax payer funded programs? These "rights" are not in the constitution but many today think that all Americans have the right to these entitlements. Please justify your answers.
Does the U.S. constitution give the federal government authority to MONOPOLIZE the making of money/currency? As far as I know, the federal government is given the power to make money as per the constitution. But does that imply the federal government is given the power, as per the constitution, to monopolize money and for them to be the sole issuer of money and to forbid currency competition? But doesn't that only concern the value of the money they print? Section 10? But that's regarding states and I don't think it works very well as an answer to my question.
What's the difference between the constitution and bill of rights? Like the main difference... I'm sort of confused...! What was the federalists and anti federalists and how did it become the republicans and democratics. And if andrew jackson despised the wealthy so much, why was HE a democrat and a wealthy slave owner himself? please don't give me long links, i just want an answer from someone like i'm talking right to them. help me understand, thanks! 10 pts bonus to those who are firstly precise at answering my questions!
The Constitution provides that one third of the Senate's membership is up for election every two years so that? The Constitution provides that one third of the Senate's membership is up for election every two years so that a) House members may decide whether to run for Senate b) committee assignments can be altered between Democrats and Republicans c) voters have less of a chance to change control of the Senate from one party to another d) the entire house and entire Senate is not voted on in the same year e) congressional apportionment can alter the size of Senate districts
Do you live in a country/society in which there's institutionalized religious oppression? In the US (where I live) there is certainly social pressure imposed by (in particular) Christians. However, our national Constitution and other laws provide some protections against governmental institutionalization of one particular faith, or the elevation of one faith over another through laws or institutions. I know not all countries or societies are like this, and some have strong governmental institutions that establish a 'national' religion (even if not strictly a theocracy). Do you live in one of these societies? If so, which - and can you briefly explain what it's like?
What do you think of Scalia's interpretation of the Constitution? TUCSON, Ariz. – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says those who want modern-day legal interpretations to view the U.S. Constitution through contemporary lenses are seeking rigidity, not flexibility, in the country's justice system. Scalia is well-known as a strict constructionist in his interpretation of the Constitution. He told a Tucson audience Monday that the rival approach favors sweeping judicial decrees to shape society "coast to coast" on issues such as abortion, rather than seeking to pass laws state by state. Scalia appeared with fellow Justice Stephen Breyer to discuss how courts should apply the Constitution. Breyer says interpretations should consider current circumstances because society has different values than it did in the 18th century on matters such as cruel and unusual punishment. Justice Scalia: Rival doctrine seeks rigidity http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091026/ap_on_re_us/us_justices_arizona . What about states rights? .
Our elected MLA's insult our own constitution in maharashtra? What happened in maharashtra assembly today while takeing oath today is pure insult of our constitution by public elected MLA's? Have they not insulted a respected maharashtrian, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedker who wrote our indian constitution? Is it ok to accept that the MLA's who did the coward act should be only suspended only for 4 years from assembly? Why they should not be sent to jail for full 5 years on regerous Imprision ? Is this the respect they have given to the votes of common man? How shell we trust our own constitution? Do we need lot of amendments in our constitution immediately?
Is there a country with a "Perfect" System of Just Law" than the United States Constitution's Rights and Law? This is an question regarding government, integrity and ethics as you will soon find out in 7 days. Is there a country with a "Perfect" System of Just Law" that far surpasses the United States, it's Constitution's Rights and all it's laws? If, there were such a place, would you give up your citizenship in your country to live in such a place? I know of such a place, which I will reveal after all answers are posted in 7 days. You will be surprise which country it is. I will be impressed of those who already know of this country.
Does the U.S. need stricter gun control? There is nothing wrong with some restrictions, such as a waiting period, one gun a month, etc. And why does ANYONE need an assault rifle? Gun-control critics whine about their 2nd amendment rights, but would like us to forget the REST of the Constitution, the parts that guarantee "a more perfect union, domestic tranquility, general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves". In the U.S., many people do not feel safe leaving their houses; there is a LACK of tranquility and general welfare in many areas, due to gun violence. Mass gun killings like Columbine, Colorado, Virginia Tech, Binghamton, NY, Pennsylvania Amish School, etc., etc., etc., are extrememly rare in other civilized countries that have strict gun control regulations. If you agree that stricter gun-control measures are needed to make the U.S. a BETTER country, ignore the NRA and neoconservatives, who only care about themselves, and write your elected officials, and tell them what you think. neocons - feel free to write back, but I am not addressing youse guys 8-)
In the 1800's what did freddom, liberty, and property rights mean to those in the south vs others? By the mid-1800s, the terms "freedom" or "liberty" and "property" rights guaranteed by the Constitution, had come to have completely different meanings, conveying completely different ideals, to residents of the South and to citizens in the rest of the country. What did "freedom," "liberty" and "property" mean to those in the South? What did these terms mean to those who did not live in the South?
Does anyone know where the U.S. Constitution went? Did Americans cross the sea in boats and go somewhere else again? Hey "agb90." what are you a top contributor of? Bush is part of the liberal Repuclican party that is failing. Obama and his cronies are just taking advantage of the weakness and bringing on Communism. Arn't you proud to be a top contributor of that? John H. , what about the demoncratic party that is joining the repueblicans in going Communist? Hey, squeky pig. You got swine flu? What have you done to fight against that?
What do you think of the second Amendment of the U.S Constitution? In case you didn't know the second amendment is the "right to bear arms." Do you think it should be repealed or are you for the second amendment and believe it should stay? Give 3 reasons why?(please list in order) Also this is not homework and I am no longer a student I was just curious on everyone's opinion of the 2nd amendment. I personally am indifferent to the 2nd amendment. It also states that the militia should have guns to defend our country and that individuals.
HOW MUCH DO U KNOW ABOUT ROMANIAS CONSTITUTION? 1When was the Constitution written? 2Who created the Constitution? 3Why was it written? 4What events led to its creation? 5Where was it written? 6.The Constitution was modeled after several major historical documents? 7How would you improve the Constitution, if anything? 8 Do you feel it is as relevant today as it was when the Constitution was first created? 9Did you find any differences or similarities between your native country's constitution and your project's country?
Is trying to figure out typographical errors considered "interpreting" the U.S. Constitution? http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A28880382 http://westwing.bewarne.com/whowhatwhere/comma.html For example: "According to some legal scholars, the presence of these commas would totally change the meaning of the Fifth Amendment so that the government would not be quite so restrained to only taking private property if it is for public use. In theory, if those commas exist, the government would have a bit more legal room to confiscate private property."
Why are Republicans unaware of the fact that sometimes it IS a judge's job to interpret what the law means? 1. The constitution doesn't specify everything, the founding fathers made it subject to loose interpretation. It actually IS a judge's job to decide and interpret what the constitution means. 2. and btw: Gay marriage is being legalized LEGISLATIVELY in several states.... It has already happened in VT, ME, NH and it is expected to happen in NY & NJ in the near-future. The legislature is elected by the people and this is after all a Republic. Any objections?
Why do some people think of the U.S Constitution as a form of higher law? Didn't dodge the class. i have a political theory class and I writing a paper on the U.S Constitution and Higher law. The topic is: A remarkable peculiarity of constitutionalism in the United States is the phenomenon of "Constitution Worship," which is sometimes attributed to the belief that the U.S. Constitution embodies a kind of "higher law" that makes it sacred and inviolable. Do you agree that a belief in the "higher law background" of the Constitution makes it less likely to be violated or even altered? Just trying to understand it before I write the wrong thing.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers